![]() But complaining about the hike per se is to give up on the idea that there might be any case for art that rewards an investment of energy and attention from its consumer.Īnd the way Burns talks about Milkman makes clear that, whether we like it or not, she is doing something with the “difficulty” of the novel. What is it doing with its difficulty? What is it asking of the reader? Does that difficulty reward the reader’s investment of time? You’re entitled, as James Marriott did in the Times, to conclude that in this case the view from the top of Snowdon wasn’t worth the hike. The question isn’t how difficult a book is, but why it’s difficult. ![]() The question is not where the book sits on some notional sliding scale between “challenging” and “page-turner”: it’s how successfully it answers whatever challenge it sets itself. Photograph: Frank Augstein/APĪttacking a literary prize for rewarding a book that doesn’t accord with a critic’s ideas about “readability” is simply philistinism. Anna Burns is presented with the Man Booker prize by Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |